0.06/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.06/0.13	% Command    : run_E %s %d THM
0.13/0.34	% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
0.13/0.34	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.13/0.34	% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
0.13/0.34	% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.13/0.34	% CPULimit   : 960
0.13/0.34	% WCLimit    : 120
0.13/0.34	% DateTime   : Tue Aug  9 03:37:05 EDT 2022
0.13/0.35	% CPUTime    : 
0.19/0.48	Running higher-order on 8 cores theorem proving
0.19/0.48	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=120 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
0.19/0.48	# Version: 3.0pre003-ho
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting new_bool_9 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho1 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho4 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho2 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting ehoh_best2_full_lfho with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting full_lambda_10 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Starting new_ho_8 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# post_as_ho12 with pid 32032 completed with status 0
0.19/0.49	# Result found by post_as_ho12
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.49	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting sh3 with 65s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# sh3 with pid 32041 completed with status 0
0.19/0.49	# Result found by sh3
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing class: HSSSSMSSSSSNSSA.
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 8 strats onto 8 cores with 120 seconds (960 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting post_as_ho12 with 120s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# No SInE strategy applied
0.19/0.49	# Search class: HHHNF-FFSF00-SSSFFFNN
0.19/0.49	# Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 120 seconds (120 total)
0.19/0.49	# Starting sh3 with 65s (1) cores
0.19/0.49	# Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
0.19/0.49	# Presaturation interreduction done
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# Proof found!
0.19/0.49	# SZS status Theorem
0.19/0.49	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_22, type, epred1_0: a > $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_23, type, epred2_0: a > $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_24, type, epred3_0: a > $o).
0.19/0.49	thf(decl_25, type, esk1_0: a).
0.19/0.49	thf(cBOOL_PROP_114_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:((((X1)=(^[X4:a]:(~($true))))<=((~(?[X4:a]:(((X2 @ X4)&(X3 @ X4))))&![X4:a]:(((X3 @ X4)<=(X1 @ X4))))&![X4:a]:(((X2 @ X4)<=(X1 @ X4)))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', cBOOL_PROP_114_pme)).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > $o, X2:a > $o, X3:a > $o]:((((~(?[X4:a]:(((X2 @ X4)&(X3 @ X4))))&![X4:a]:(((X1 @ X4)=>(X3 @ X4))))&![X4:a]:(((X1 @ X4)=>(X2 @ X4))))=>![X11:a]:(~(X1 @ X11))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cBOOL_PROP_114_pme])])])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ![X15:a, X16:a, X17:a]:(((((~(epred2_0 @ X15)|~(epred3_0 @ X15))&(~(epred1_0 @ X16)|(epred3_0 @ X16)))&(~(epred1_0 @ X17)|(epred2_0 @ X17)))&(epred1_0 @ esk1_0))), inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])])])])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:((~((epred2_0 @ X4))|~((epred3_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:(((epred3_0 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:(((epred2_0 @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ esk1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:(~((epred1_0 @ X4))), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_3, c_0_4]), c_0_5])).
0.19/0.49	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7]), ['proof']).
0.19/0.49	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.19/0.49	# Parsed axioms                        : 2
0.19/0.49	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
0.19/0.49	# Initial clauses                      : 5
0.19/0.49	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1
0.19/0.49	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
0.19/0.49	# Processed clauses                    : 9
0.19/0.49	# ...of these trivial                  : 0
0.19/0.49	# ...subsumed                          : 0
0.19/0.49	# ...remaining for further processing  : 9
0.19/0.49	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Backward-subsumed                    : 2
0.19/0.49	# Backward-rewritten                   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Generated clauses                    : 2
0.19/0.49	# ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1
0.19/0.49	# ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.19/0.49	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.19/0.49	# Paramodulations                      : 1
0.19/0.49	# Factorizations                       : 0
0.19/0.49	# NegExts                              : 0
0.19/0.49	# Equation resolutions                 : 0
0.19/0.49	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional check models        : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.19/0.49	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.19/0.49	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2
0.19/0.49	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 0
0.19/0.49	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
0.19/0.49	#    Negative unit clauses             : 1
0.19/0.49	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1
0.19/0.49	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
0.19/0.49	# ...number of literals in the above   : 0
0.19/0.49	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.19/0.49	# Current number of archived clauses   : 7
0.19/0.49	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
0.19/0.49	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
0.19/0.49	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
0.19/0.49	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
0.19/0.49	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.19/0.49	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
0.19/0.49	# BW rewrite match successes           : 0
0.19/0.49	# Condensation attempts                : 0
0.19/0.49	# Condensation successes               : 0
0.19/0.49	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 425
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.49	# User time                : 0.003 s
0.19/0.49	# System time              : 0.002 s
0.19/0.49	# Total time               : 0.005 s
0.19/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1772 pages
0.19/0.49	
0.19/0.49	# -------------------------------------------------
0.19/0.49	# User time                : 0.005 s
0.19/0.49	# System time              : 0.003 s
0.19/0.49	# Total time               : 0.008 s
0.19/0.49	# Maximum resident set size: 1720 pages
0.19/0.49	EOF